From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEBBC77B73 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230010AbjDTSvL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:51:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55968 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231157AbjDTSvH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:51:07 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 511 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:51:00 PDT Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F712D58 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:51:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1682016657; bh=aOUOncamuei97Vu6sivVlt041a1msFjzaF6U6ySdhyo=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S8PyOqu04pGaR4bVpGhUhQCdT+EevZ6qo2jJPGXFyaqD2sWInj9lzHU+ZuAPdscVF 7DtEtS6fi0w/ssAidneNLViBRNxtAX5jStdzPJ2b+8k4QaK9vKrX8j2cs6WszCrLzH vGEECDWuZD/xASVPp0MIVavcXpBPrFU3C1Nxrj2M= Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20B3066144; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:50:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <18c7a2891d8a192f4a88b10d403baeaa8b31797e.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] MIPS: Fallback CPU -march CFLAG to ISA level if unsupported From: Xi Ruoyao To: Nick Desaulniers , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Jiaxun Yang Cc: "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , llvm@lists.linux.dev, Nathan Chancellor , Huacai Chen , kernel@xen0n.name, loongarch@lists.linux.dev Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:50:54 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20230414080701.15503-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20230414080701.15503-7-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <550FCA0F-2C48-4133-85B0-D9494CC1C23C@flygoat.com> <20230419221500.GA17797@alpha.franken.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 02:42 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > Hi Nick, >=20 > On Thu, 2023-04-20 at 09:32 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > Separate question to Huacai, Wang, and the loongarch list; I know > > LLVM > > landed the Loongarch backend recently; any idea what's the status of > > building arch=3Dloongarch with LLVM=3D1 (linux kernel)? >=20 > AFAIK there are some issues not resolved yet: > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1787 I must be completely stupid: I didn't see you are the one raised the ticket :). --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University