From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA05507; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:55:45 -0700 Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA01006 for linux-list; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:55:15 -0700 Received: from morgaine.engr.sgi.com (morgaine.engr.sgi.com [130.62.16.64]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA00740 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:54:33 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by morgaine.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA15317 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:52:11 -0700 Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA29433 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:52:10 -0700 Received: from caipfs.rutgers.edu (caipfs.rutgers.edu [128.6.155.100]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id LAA16793 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:52:08 -0700 env-from (davem@caipfs.rutgers.edu) Received: from jenolan.caipgeneral (jenolan.rutgers.edu [128.6.111.5]) by caipfs.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA28390; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 14:47:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by jenolan.caipgeneral (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA05887; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 14:45:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 14:45:53 -0400 Message-Id: <199706171845.OAA05887@jenolan.caipgeneral> From: "David S. Miller" To: knobi@munich.sgi.com CC: miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx, offer@sgi.com, linux@morgaine.engr.sgi.com In-reply-to: <33A6D7CB.4DAA@munich.sgi.com> (message from Martin Knoblauch on Tue, 17 Jun 1997 20:30:36 +0200) Subject: Re: Good news: no more begging for HW Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 20:30:36 +0200 From: Martin Knoblauch GE == Geometry engine. The part of the OpenGL pipeline that does the 3D transformations, lighting and other FPU intensive stuff. How fast can these suckers assemble components along an interpolated line? Is it something like 1 component per clock at 300Mhz? (some of you might know where that rate comes from, if you do, two points for you ;-) Later, David "Sparc" Miller davem@caip.rutgers.edu