From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA2067719 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:24:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA2481750 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:23:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from dist.engr.sgi.com (dist.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.118]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA4285008 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by dist.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA75923508 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:23:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id SAA22304 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:23:12 -0800 (PST) mail_from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de) From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-09.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.9]) by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA04160 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 03:22:54 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA03675; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 03:22:34 +0100 Message-ID: <19980327032232.53573@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 03:22:32 +0100 To: Ulf Carlsson Cc: linux@dist.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Linux for Nintendo 64 References: <19980326192052.46479@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e In-Reply-To: ; from Ulf Carlsson on Thu, Mar 26, 1998 at 11:05:11PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Mar 26, 1998 at 11:05:11PM +0100, Ulf Carlsson wrote: > > Sigh... Quite a lot of people apparently don't know the special meaning > > of the 1st of April and mailed me about Linux for Nitendo. Some of them > > became very agressive and insulting when I told them the article'd be > > just hoax ... > > When did the 25th or March become the 1st of April? Since when was ``Luciano Apriliani'' in an article published in the April issue not a sufficient hint ... Ralf