From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA60144 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA85011 for linux-list; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA42947 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:11:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sgi.sgi.com!rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [193.175.24.38]) by sgi.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA18741 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:11:46 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from hub-fue by rachael.franken.de via rmail with uucp id for cthulhu.engr.sgi.com!linux; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 02:11:41 +0200 (MET DST) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built DST-Sep-8) Received: by hub-fue.franken.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #35) id m0zCYbm-002P86C; Sat, 29 Aug 98 02:11 MET DST Received: (from tsbogend@localhost) by alpha.franken.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id CAA06005; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 02:08:18 +0200 Message-ID: <19980829020818.25410@alpha.franken.de> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 02:08:18 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de Cc: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Emacs problem References: <19980823223647.12724@alpha.franken.de> <19980824121930.00186@uni-koblenz.de> <19980825225603.43888@alpha.franken.de> <19980828123154.B358@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85 In-Reply-To: <19980828123154.B358@uni-koblenz.de>; from ralf@uni-koblenz.de on Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 12:31:54PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 12:31:54PM +0200, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 1998 at 10:56:03PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > > Another questione does gcc/egcs produce .sdata, .lit4 or .li8 sections > > on Linux/MIPS ? > > These sections are mostly being used for code using global pointer > optimization. .lit8 is also being used for fp code when assembling li.d > macros. as they don't show up in the temacs binary, I'll ignore them for unexec(). With a crude hack in unexec(), I now have a emcas binary, which will show up an empty X window. Looking with strace and tcpdump it looks like emacs tries to do more X work, but doesn't succeed. Stuff for the weekend ... Thomas. -- See, you not only have to be a good coder to create a system like Linux, you have to be a sneaky bastard too ;-) [Linus Torvalds in <4rikft$7g5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>]