From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id CAA72079 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 02:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id CAA38087 for linux-list; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 02:40:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id CAA09112 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 02:40:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sgi.sgi.com!rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [193.175.24.38]) by sgi.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id CAA09970 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 02:40:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from hub-fue by rachael.franken.de via rmail with uucp id for cthulhu.engr.sgi.com!linux; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 11:40:03 +0200 (MET DST) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built DST-Sep-8) Received: by hub-fue.franken.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #35) id m0zFbIV-002Ow7C; Sun, 6 Sep 98 11:39 MET DST Received: (from tsbogend@localhost) by alpha.franken.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id LAA00981; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 11:37:15 +0200 Message-ID: <19980906113715.16157@alpha.franken.de> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 11:37:15 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Ulf Carlsson Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: SCSI problems References: <19980905223307.15653@alpha.franken.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85 In-Reply-To: ; from Ulf Carlsson on Sun, Sep 06, 1998 at 10:54:52AM +0200 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 06, 1998 at 10:54:52AM +0200, Ulf Carlsson wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > Which processor do you have, e.g. which dma_cache_wback_inv procedure are > you making use of? it's a R4600 with second level cache. So it should use r4k_dma_cache_wback_inv_sc(), too. Thomas. -- See, you not only have to be a good coder to create a system like Linux, you have to be a sneaky bastard too ;-) [Linus Torvalds in <4rikft$7g5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>]