From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA54366 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA80838 for linux-list; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:21:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA62179 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA03729 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:21:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de) Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-19.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.19]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA10225 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 02:21:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA03511; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 02:21:13 +0200 Message-ID: <19980924022113.N2843@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 02:21:13 +0200 From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de To: Richard Hartensveld Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Alex deVries , Rob Lembree , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: challenge s boots linux References: <36081982.8D3B6975@infopact.nl> <19980923212241.01963@alpha.franken.de> <19980924015938.K2843@uni-koblenz.de> <36098F84.78D3764E@infopact.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1 In-Reply-To: <36098F84.78D3764E@infopact.nl>; from Richard Hartensveld on Thu, Sep 24, 1998 at 02:17:08AM +0200 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Sep 24, 1998 at 02:17:08AM +0200, Richard Hartensveld wrote: > > Did I missunderstand the 95's documentation - I thought we can abuse the > > 95 as a 93, thereby saving alot of driver work for now? > > > > My experience is that the wd93 driver doens't work with the wd95 controller, maybe > someone else hassuccessfully tried this? It's not supposed to work without any changes at all. Ralf