From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA26831 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA63932 for linux-list; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:15:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA19291 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:14:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sgi.sgi.com!rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [193.175.24.38]) by sgi.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA02434 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from hub-fue by rachael.franken.de via rmail with uucp id for engr.sgi.com!linux; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 22:14:52 +0100 (MET) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built DST-Sep-8) Received: by hub-fue.franken.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #35) id m0zTujP-002PLGC; Thu, 15 Oct 98 23:14 MET DST Received: (from tsbogend@localhost) by alpha.franken.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id WAA02817; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 22:59:24 +0200 Message-ID: <19981015225923.A2812@alpha.franken.de> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 22:59:23 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Milo & R4000SC References: <19981014142443.F392@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1 In-Reply-To: <19981014142443.F392@uni-koblenz.de>; from ralf@uni-koblenz.de on Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:24:43PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:24:43PM +0200, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote: > Any success in finally getting rid of Milo? Milo was already gone, when I posted my questions about tags. My kernel is also nearly free of tags, only the RM200 code contains some pieces. Thomas. -- This device has completely bogus header. Compaq scores again :-| It's a host bridge, but it should be called ghost bridge instead ;^) [Martin `MJ' Mares on linux-kernel]