From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA46613 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA04385 for linux-list; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:17:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA10495 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:17:57 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA08601 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:17:44 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (pmport-12.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.12]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA14516 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:17:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA01556; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:10:43 +0200 Message-ID: <19981019011043.B387@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:10:43 +0200 From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de To: kyriazis@sgi.com Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: XZ References: <19981018015624.H4768@uni-koblenz.de> <199810181732.KAA51624@jibe.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1 In-Reply-To: <199810181732.KAA51624@jibe.engr.sgi.com>; from George Kyriazis on Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:32:26AM -0700 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:32:26AM -0700, George Kyriazis wrote: > In a previous episode, ralf@uni-koblenz.de claimed: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 11:17:25AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > > > > If XZ isn't another name for newport, then no. > > > > XL is the official name for the Newport. > > > I am not familiar with what Linux exactly is ported on, but my guess would be > only Newport. > > XZ is a non-Newport based card for Indy. XZ has more-or-less the same > internal architecture as Elan/Extreme, so it's probably a safe bet that > is it not supported. Correct. Ralf