From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:12:58 -0800 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:26146 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:12:36 -0800 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id EAA29628; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:15:37 -0800 (PST) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id EAA20062 for linux-list; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:09:33 -0800 (PST) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id EAA64921 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:09:30 -0800 (PST) mail_from (ralf@oss.sgi.com) Received: from lappi (animaniacs.conectiva.com.br [200.250.58.146]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id EAA07367 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:09:26 -0800 (PST) mail_from (ralf@oss.sgi.com) Received: by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de id ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 10:09:00 -0200 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 10:09:00 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Kevin D. Kissell" Cc: Marc Esipovich , Linux SGI Subject: Re: Question for David Miller or anyone else about R6000 code Message-ID: <19991206100900.F765@uni-koblenz.de> References: <006801bf3fde$cd110ec0$0ceca8c0@satanas.mips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3us In-Reply-To: <006801bf3fde$cd110ec0$0ceca8c0@satanas.mips.com> X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linuxmips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linuxmips-outgoing On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 12:41:08PM +0100, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > The R10000/R12000 programs are still within SGI, > and are not supported directly by MIPS Technologies > Inc. The MIPS/Linux kernel today does not support > the R10000 (there's a panic("CPU too expensive"); > somewhere if the Processor ID for R10K is detected), MIPS64 has R10k support. I didn't even try to fix it for MIPS32 because that kernel only supports upto 512mb memory. And as you say it was easy to implement. Ralf