From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2AFD14B942 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739556997; cv=none; b=IOpAiNRtgDshsrdPNviJV2BjCy3c8HX/jRl4eqQEKtmGEddDfdoU8SZKkF6SChAQZnrogQAdvtTnUXmtAMKjfgaDMuY2V4hCkje2FUDLEz0M6QI5dUtXdppxbKVvCgf6f61/zTgggVhVEooXsByA6t7Yt/5Ae+gbg5iKXY7t9Po= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739556997; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nDKtV9ySw4mozGGWlDjjCWMvxLbaCdy6txFVjPMX6KY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jm/67sLuJLcy+I0Tg2cSq4M5jn0sGra32RRq3ZParG/8m+hKvACSkU6KPRGrVbopCds0f/+4sZ9ng+KlBOZ3yOXEmUbRmerBkW3j/ex+hwlv0DiGoSB/hk3QEpwUj3yfc+Dzwhu+Ict5w5G5Iqyog9WH8b+umGO+a+AhAr/NsYA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=Tm1JuBk/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="Tm1JuBk/" Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4395578be70so24507725e9.2 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:16:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1739556992; x=1740161792; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WpzQbnLdagNuUxuQR/6JxQR5FVOFTqBbuMpnc5Onjr8=; b=Tm1JuBk/vh8PRcm7UXbEwZLsNE55/+5jj7Kxme0JUz4YPZ5T5uR+wmr/7hzTNWdQUS sQRW2+3XsR2pqXkwp+cp060sIH4VxY81201GN+vmD0sg3EV48bdE6kkfa2tomXbmXtjq 80srL3oyHO5RG4E5kHHcqa3CE1scr2KpoLg7TKvsNEEnhaYcXq0ZjrT2VSGSK/CWMJCo qA8FiU6e9uMA8EHw8fWLMGE6byH4mT7TKgwegVQrImMMaNzTTmjAa9KqZ6xpB+pLY//D onQQ0IaFdQx0zOIBraGqtdCfKMXNSVmmCU5XZOUCVP6nFzbziTm8M+mCpCZ9zjzUH7pu STsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739556992; x=1740161792; h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WpzQbnLdagNuUxuQR/6JxQR5FVOFTqBbuMpnc5Onjr8=; b=ktEsb5wJQXSc+dY1My0wEVr4J5RkL3PLFvXRo+eylbwFz3chPO60FGdf10H3wscfDJ RFkzzA3jE65fTkOm+jHyl/DulAKVXp5LbTp3p2PazBiRIURk38OzwA+fRb1GFPIWi23T OWKJAq1QQO0E+Qw3NANX3AsLqfStpVB1R9RqteY8MSkAo6jbSSuqo6koiBEnA4xkUZCr NqlIk/jhcD1NJs42ASMlcR+oDL5VdQ00nq8hp7jz5x6F2rcpsdId3LH2JkbWxmTFLSxk GpqCueIoTZt0QfWvj0CRLPOzNszNbap8eE9mAEkoaYNs2Q94COMMi5P9v5YRvwTRWHFk fbmA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXOx6W0OlD++bljKi87W1ii0keoxD2tlq70m40Nt+lx2jsayLb5GjYmQeY7qfMu9/kBNAO+bqNpD16U@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwUEW1mhhlg+LfxzA4+mpzcV7pqyn4byrVOcBBSC0UrrnhNhE1x iCGkOtFh/mz94UV8fy/xikYHIfRM6WH2S4askL0Qh8A1wOU62X3109++ea2kHdY= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuHng6H438AVxJoonoI819u0zvHf8jNB4SQGITpramaLtJDRkR9oTF3h9PUWDZ DESZkpkIJaVC/CyXl6JlQNwwl1tntEc1DXgX3BHfRfp/QlM5Iqslf3Dji93zsOTmlrhRjmAOS+0 /Eh06m25aTbuZmpxOtXOU8alS1Lz/EQqHSWzvPcrSJgOwnUsVqt9nOrLKkd5g+X2ur0d1U6PTqp DcGfwkDCDUilC1YMQhywlIo0P73IWJ3LrFxSbNZWgF4zift67A4ddHE83vRuoK+o7mGHeh075/1 cR99yWWJCldW2Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFBN3j/Zjv2CLSxpQNFmRLH07Um+mn6wIlqNWgyJFTqmPU8STnXQY2KZybJYPY9YWV6H4qloQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:154c:b0:38f:2025:9c2b with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f20259e49mr13952599f8f.33.1739556991710; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:16:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a01:e0a:3c5:5fb1:7018:8c7:bdd4:3436]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f258cccd3sm5221627f8f.23.2025.02.14.10.16.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:16:31 -0800 (PST) From: Jerome Brunet To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dave Ertman , Ira Weiny , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Stephen Boyd , Arnd Bergmann , Danilo Krummrich , Conor Dooley , Daire McNamara , Philipp Zabel , Douglas Anderson , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Hans de Goede , Ilpo =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Bryan O'Donoghue , Vladimir Kondratiev , Gregory CLEMENT , =?utf-8?Q?Th=C3=A9o?= Lebrun , Michael Turquette , Abel Vesa , Peng Fan , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Kevin Hilman , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] driver core: auxiliary bus: add device creation helpers In-Reply-To: <2025021437-washout-stonewall-d13e@gregkh> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:33:35 +0100") References: <20250211-aux-device-create-helper-v3-0-7edb50524909@baylibre.com> <20250211-aux-device-create-helper-v3-1-7edb50524909@baylibre.com> <2025021437-washout-stonewall-d13e@gregkh> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.8; emacs 29.4 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 19:16:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1jwmdsxugx.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri 14 Feb 2025 at 17:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:27:58PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> Add helper functions to create a device on the auxiliary bus. >> >> This is meant for fairly simple usage of the auxiliary bus, to avoid having >> the same code repeated in the different drivers. >> >> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann >> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet >> --- >> drivers/base/auxiliary.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/auxiliary_bus.h | 10 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+) > > I like the idea, see much the same of what I recently did for the "faux" > bus here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/2025021023-sandstorm-precise-9f5d@gregkh/ Reading this, I'm getting the feeling that some (most?) simple auxiliary driver might be better off migrating to "faux", instead of what I'm proposing here ? Is this what you are suggesting ? Few Q: Is there some sort of 'platform_data' (sorry for the lack of a better term, no provocation intended ;) ) ... it there a simple way to pass an arbitrary struct to the created device with 'faux' ? The difference between aux and faux I'm seeing it that aux seems to decouple things a bit more. The only thing aux needs is a module name to pop something up, while faux needs a reference to the ops instead. I can see the appeal to use aux for maintainers trying to decouple different subsystems. > > Some review comments: > >> diff --git a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c >> index afa4df4c5a3f371b91d8dd8c4325495d32ad1291..0f697c9c243dc9a50498a52362806db594345faf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c >> @@ -385,6 +385,94 @@ void auxiliary_driver_unregister(struct auxiliary_driver *auxdrv) >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(auxiliary_driver_unregister); >> >> +static void auxiliary_device_release(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct auxiliary_device *auxdev = to_auxiliary_dev(dev); >> + >> + kfree(auxdev); >> +} >> + >> +static struct auxiliary_device *auxiliary_device_create(struct device *dev, >> + const char *modname, >> + const char *devname, >> + void *platform_data, > > Can you have the caller set the platform_data if they need/want it after > the device is created? Or do you need that in the probe callback? My assumption was that it is needed in probe, but I guess that entirely depends on the driver. If that was ever needed, it could be added later I think. > > And can't this be a global function too for those that don't want to > deal with devm stuff? There was a note about that in the cover-letter of the v1 but I did not repeat it after. It can be exported but I had no use for it so I thought It was better not export it until it was actually needed. I really do not have a strong preference over this. > >> + int id) >> +{ >> + struct auxiliary_device *auxdev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + auxdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*auxdev), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!auxdev) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > Ick, who cares what the error value really is? Why not just do NULL or > a valid pointer? That makes the caller much simpler to handle, right? > Sure why not >> + >> + auxdev->id = id; >> + auxdev->name = devname; >> + auxdev->dev.parent = dev; >> + auxdev->dev.platform_data = platform_data; >> + auxdev->dev.release = auxiliary_device_release; >> + device_set_of_node_from_dev(&auxdev->dev, dev); >> + >> + ret = auxiliary_device_init(auxdev); > > Only way this will fail is if you forgot to set parent or a valid name. > So why not check for devname being non-NULL above this? If auxiliary_device_init() ever changes it would be easy to forget to update that and lead to something nasty to debug, don't you think ? If you are OK with this, I could update in this direction. > >> + if (ret) { >> + kfree(auxdev); >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + } >> + >> + ret = __auxiliary_device_add(auxdev, modname); >> + if (ret) { >> + /* >> + * NOTE: It may look odd but auxdev should not be freed >> + * here. auxiliary_device_uninit() calls device_put() >> + * which call the device release function, freeing auxdev. >> + */ >> + auxiliary_device_uninit(auxdev); > > Yes it is odd, are you SURE you should be calling device_del() on the > device if this fails? auxiliary_device_uninit(), makes sense so why not > just call that here? I'm confused ... I am call auxiliary_device_uninit() here. What do you mean ? > >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + } >> + >> + return auxdev; >> +} >> + >> +static void auxiliary_device_destroy(void *_auxdev) >> +{ >> + struct auxiliary_device *auxdev = _auxdev; >> + >> + auxiliary_device_delete(auxdev); >> + auxiliary_device_uninit(auxdev); >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * __devm_auxiliary_device_create - create a device on the auxiliary bus >> + * @dev: parent device >> + * @modname: module name used to create the auxiliary driver name. >> + * @devname: auxiliary bus device name >> + * @platform_data: auxiliary bus device platform data >> + * @id: auxiliary bus device id >> + * >> + * Device managed helper to create an auxiliary bus device. >> + * The device create matches driver 'modname.devname' on the auxiliary bus. >> + */ >> +struct auxiliary_device *__devm_auxiliary_device_create(struct device *dev, >> + const char *modname, >> + const char *devname, >> + void *platform_data, >> + int id) >> +{ >> + struct auxiliary_device *auxdev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + auxdev = auxiliary_device_create(dev, modname, devname, platform_data, id); >> + if (IS_ERR(auxdev)) >> + return auxdev; >> + >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, auxiliary_device_destroy, >> + auxdev); > > Oh this is going to be messy, but I trust that callers know what they > are doing here. Good luck! :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h -- Jerome