From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 06:32:09 -0700 Received: from home135.liacs.nl ([132.229.210.135]:2308 "EHLO fog.mors.wiggy.net") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 06:31:56 -0700 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.11.0.Beta1/8.10.1/Debian 8.10.1-1) id e67F3au00671 for linux-mips@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:03:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:03:36 +0200 From: Wichert Akkerman To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Question concerning necessary libraries for 2.4.x kernel upgrade Message-ID: <20000707170336.G565@cistron.nl> Mail-Followup-To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com References: <3964C025.623F7F5@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Cgrdyab2wu3Akvjd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3964C025.623F7F5@ti.com>; from jharrell@ti.com on Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 11:21:41AM -0600 Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing --Cgrdyab2wu3Akvjd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Previously Jeff Harrell wrote: > modutils 2.3.0 There is (and was) no such thing as modutils 2.3.0. Perhaps you mean modutils 2.3.10? Wichert. --=20 _________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | --Cgrdyab2wu3Akvjd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjll8UgACgkQPLiSUC+jvC1vLQCdHApmMKCF2zBVtbDh/L15+Yh/ ux8AoI/HoqMtlyho18PwIiL0Q40EucKR =vH9u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Cgrdyab2wu3Akvjd--