From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>
To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: bug in the latest cache code?
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 19:38:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000810193858.A1478@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3992007C.49050FC@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 06:08:12PM -0700
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 06:08:12PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote:
> I spent the last a few days to track down a problem where /sbin/init
> hangs forever. It turns out, I believe, to be a bug introduced in the
> recent cache code change.
>
> A new function, r4k_flush_icache_page_i32(), was added recently. It
> calls blast_icache32_page(), which uses Hit cache operations to flush
> cache. Unfortunately, that will generate TLB fault if virtual address
> is not present in TLB. Under certain conditions,
> r4k_flush_icache_page_i32() will be called in the middle of handling a
> page fault, and it will then generate the same page fault again with
> cache hit operation. This causes a deadlock (on current->mm->mmap_sem).
>
> I read the previous version of code. The fix seems to be using the
> indexed cache operation. Here is the fix, and apparently it fixes the
> problem on my board.
I can see how this may happen and will take care of fixing this one.
We really want to avoid using index operations. Unlike what the comment
in the kernel code suggest they do overly flush caches which is pretty
expensive.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-10 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-10 1:08 bug in the latest cache code? Jun Sun
2000-08-10 2:30 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2000-08-10 17:38 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2000-08-10 17:50 ` Jun Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000810193858.A1478@bacchus.dhis.org \
--to=ralf@uni-koblenz.de \
--cc=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox