From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:39:15 -0700 Received: from u-141.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.18.141]:62980 "EHLO u-141.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:38:58 -0700 Received: (ralf@lappi) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de id ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:03:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:03:41 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Ian Chilton Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Problem with the new glibc-2.0.6 Message-ID: <20000928010341.A1834@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20000927214754.A20741@woody.ichilton.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000927214754.A20741@woody.ichilton.co.uk>; from mailinglist@ichilton.co.uk on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:47:54PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:47:54PM +0100, Ian Chilton wrote: > I built the older glibc 2.0.6 fine, but had problems with egcs when I built dynamically, and ldconfig would not work...so, I started again... > > However, the new glibc that was released the other day, does not work :( > > I am using binutils 2.8.1 and egcs 1.0.3a > > Any ideas? The common dominator of the bug reports I have is building with binutils 2.8.1, so I'll have to take another look at this piece of sh^H^Hpleasure. Ralf