From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 05:41:50 -0700 Received: from u-118.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.21.118]:52489 "EHLO u-118.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 05:41:29 -0700 Received: (ralf@lappi) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de id ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:41:12 +0200 Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:41:12 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Florian Lohoff Cc: Jun Sun , linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Message-ID: <20001014144112.C4396@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <39E7EB73.9206D0DB@mvista.com> <20001014125532.A1536@paradigm.rfc822.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20001014125532.A1536@paradigm.rfc822.org>; from flo@rfc822.org on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:55:32PM +0200 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:55:32PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > 3.glibc > > ------- > > > > a) the cvs tree on oss.sgi.com (v2.0.6). Any patch needed? > > *urgs* 2.0.6 - I am currently building everything against 2.0.6 but > i rather now then later stop using it - But currently i am not using 2.2 > because with the newest patch set by Ralf (glibc + binutils) i get > a bus error while using rpcgen with the freshly build 2.2 glibc in > the build process ... > > > Florian pointed out the following patch. I am not 100% sure if it is > > aginst the current sgi CVS tree. Any confirmation? > > > > ftp://ftp.rfc822.org/pub/local/debian-mips/patches/rel32-glibc.diff > > This is the corresponding patch to the binutils things - Doesnt solve > my problem though. I got a newer libc 2.2 patch for you to try . I'll make a new patch and send it to you. (All the GOT1_OK stupidity has to be removed from the patch you have.) Ralf