From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 07:26:23 -0700 Received: from u-97.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.10.97]:27914 "EHLO u-97.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 07:26:07 -0700 Received: (ralf@lappi) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de id ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:25:46 +0200 Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:25:46 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Christopher C. Chimelis" Cc: Florian Lohoff , Jun Sun , linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Message-ID: <20001014162546.A6206@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20001014125532.A1536@paradigm.rfc822.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from chris@debian.org on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:33:35AM -0400 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:33:35AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > *urgs* 2.0.6 - I am currently building everything against 2.0.6 but > > i rather now then later stop using it - But currently i am not using 2.2 > > because with the newest patch set by Ralf (glibc + binutils) i get > > a bus error while using rpcgen with the freshly build 2.2 glibc in > > the build process ... > > Ugh. Well, once you all figure out if binutils is to blame or if it's > gcc, drop me a note and I'll make sure to spit out a binutils package that > includes the good patch... It's not obvious what's causing his problem. Florian: Can you run elf/ld.so from your glibc 2.2 tree without any further options or does it die? Ralf