From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553783AbQJPLa3>;
	Mon, 16 Oct 2000 04:30:29 -0700
Received: from u-206.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.18.206]:26379
        "EHLO u-206.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de") by oss.sgi.com
	with ESMTP id <S553779AbQJPLaZ>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 04:30:25 -0700
Received: (ralf@lappi) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de id <S869487AbQJPLaK>;
        Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:30:10 +0200
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:30:10 +0200
From:   Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To:     Jay Carlson <nop@nop.com>
Cc:     Mike Klar <mfklar@ponymail.com>, Jay Carlson <nop@place.org>,
        linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
Message-ID: <20001016133010.B17878@bacchus.dhis.org>
References: <NDBBIDGAOKMNJNDAHDDMAENPCMAA.mfklar@ponymail.com> <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNOECBCAAA.nop@nop.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNOECBCAAA.nop@nop.com>; from nop@nop.com on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:26:19AM -0400
X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:26:19AM -0400, Jay Carlson wrote:

> Does anyone know if gcc 2.97 can build glibc 2.0.x?

I'm using a glibc snapshot of about two weeks ago which seems to work fine
for glibc.  I however suspect it's making Emacs die and Emacs addicts
keep insisting that this isn't within spec ;-)

  Ralf