From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:25:29 -0700 Received: from u-247.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.21.247]:62480 "EHLO u-247.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:25:04 -0700 Received: (ralf@lappi) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de id ; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 03:24:44 +0200 Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 03:24:44 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Jay Carlson Cc: aj@suse.de, Jun Sun , linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Message-ID: <20001021032444.A27648@bacchus.dhis.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nop@nop.com on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:03:24AM -0400 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:03:24AM -0400, Jay Carlson wrote: > > {AJ} Either use as compiler egcs 1.1.2 or the current development > > version of > > gcc 2.96 from CVS. gcc 2.95.x does not work correctly on mips-linux. > > Why not 1.0.3a+patches? And could you mention a day that a 2.97 checkout > was known to work? 1.0.3a doesn't work for compiling glibc 2.1.94 on any architecture due to a bug in the handling of weak undefined symbols - they're emitted as strong symbols. Ralf