From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: process lockups
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 04:47:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001024044736.B3397@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001024032232.A3426@excalibur.cologne.de>; from karsten@excalibur.cologne.de on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 03:22:32AM +0200
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 03:22:32AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> I am running Kernel 2.4.0-test9 on a DECstation 5000/150. I am
> experiencing a strange behaviour when having strong I/O-load, such as
> running a "tar xvf foobar.tgz" with a large archive. After some time of
> activity the process (in this case tar) is stuck in status "D". There is
> neither an entry in the syslog nor on the console that would give me a
> hint what is happening. Is anyone else experiencing this?
I observe similar stuck processes on Origins - even without massive I/O
load. I'm trying to track them but little success aside of fixing a few
unrelated little bugs. Do you observe those on your R4k box also?
Another things which I'm observing is that I occasinally can't unmount
a filesystem. umount then says the fs is still in use. Sometimes it's
at least possible to remount the fs r/o. Have you also observed this one?
> Another thing I see on my 5000/150 (and only there - this is my only
> R4K-machine, so I do not know whether this is CPU- or machine-type-bound)
> is "top" going weird, eating lots of CPU cycles and spitting messages
> "schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value fffbd0b2 from 800900f8; Setting
> flush to zero for top". I know Florian also has this on his 5000/150.
> Anyone else with the same behavoiur or any idea about the cause for this?
Setting flush to zero for <process name> means that the floating point
approximator is now enabled ;-)
The schedule_timeout thing is unrelated; I've never heared of it before.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-24 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-24 1:22 process lockups Karsten Merker
2000-10-24 2:47 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2000-10-24 5:51 ` Houten K.H.C. van (Karel)
2000-10-24 11:15 ` Karsten Merker
2000-10-24 14:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-24 17:55 ` Karsten Merker
2000-10-25 1:29 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-24 15:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-24 12:25 ` Florian Lohoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001024044736.B3397@bacchus.dhis.org \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox