From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:36:18 -0800 Received: from u-214-21.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.21.214]:25348 "EHLO u-214-21.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:36:06 -0800 Received: (ralf@lappi) by bacchus.dhis.org id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 02:35:45 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 02:35:45 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Dan Aizenstros Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Multiple copies of pci-dma.c file. Message-ID: <20001124023545.A9305@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <3A1BD888.7FB3C6A6@vcubed.com> <20001122165653.A6421@bacchus.dhis.org> <3A1D946B.CEF85110@vcubed.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <3A1D946B.CEF85110@vcubed.com>; from dan@vcubed.com on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 05:04:27PM -0500 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 05:04:27PM -0500, Dan Aizenstros wrote: > Should the dma_cache_inv actually be a dma_cache_wback_inv? Conceptually your right and I've therefore changed the kernel. It wasn't a bug though because the actual implementation was in both cases actually doing a dma_cache_wback_inv. > Also, the sni directory contains a dma.c which is they same as pci-dma.c > and should be removed. ``He's dead, Jim''. Ralf