From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:51:56 -0800 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:22510 "EHLO dhcp046.distro.conectiva") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:51:44 -0800 Received: (ralf@lappi) by bacchus.dhis.org id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:47:59 -0200 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:47:59 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Carsten Langgaard Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 64 bit build fails Message-ID: <20001219154759.A6566@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <3A379CBC.ED1D9F@mips.com> <20001214215933.C28871@bacchus.dhis.org> <3A39CC1F.8FE7B2FE@mips.com> <20001215162023.B28594@bacchus.dhis.org> <3A3DC6BA.DAC68261@mips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <3A3DC6BA.DAC68261@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:11:38AM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:11:38AM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote: > Of course some time it is a little bit annoying you doesn't just accept > my patches :-) Just kidding, I think that's the right way to do things. Actually I tried to apply the patch but patch thinks your patch isn't a valid patch file ... > I was just hoping that the 64bit code was in the same condition as the > rest of the code. Depends. It's running fairly well on Origins; nobody made a more than halfbreed attempt to support IP22 for mips64, so what you see was kind of what had to be expected. Ralf