From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:43:52 -0800 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:61179 "EHLO lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:43:29 -0800 Received: (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) by bacchus.dhis.org id ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:41:14 -0200 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:41:14 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Quinn Jensen Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Glibc-error. Message-ID: <20010119164114.A2182@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <3A611CFF.FD28766@isratech.ro> <3A688998.1080608@Lineo.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A688998.1080608@Lineo.COM>; from jensenq@Lineo.COM on Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:38:16AM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:38:16AM -0700, Quinn Jensen wrote: > I'm curious which version of glibc incorporated > support for syscall changes that have occured > with the 2.4.0 kernel. Or is it all there yet > even with glibc 2.2.1? They're in 2.2.x. Ralf