From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S554040AbRBEWIR>;
	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:08:17 -0800
Received: from sgigate.SGI.COM ([204.94.209.1]:18902 "EHLO dea.waldorf-gmbh.de")
	by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S553765AbRBEWH5>;
	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:07:57 -0800
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f15M1E004103;
	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:01:14 -0800
Date:   Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:01:14 -0800
From:   Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To:     Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven),
        carstenl@mips.com (Carsten Langgaard), linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption
Message-ID: <20010205140114.D3880@bacchus.dhis.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10102051356090.1124-100000@escobaria.sonytel.be> <E14PlGy-0003IW-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <E14PlGy-0003IW-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:01:33PM +0000
X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing

On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:01:33PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Is the zero page mapped on non-m68k architectures?
> 
> It can certainly be hit by DMA and kernel memory ops
> 
> > > I dont believe any 2.4 is currently 'safe'
> > Ugh...
> 
> We'll get there, its doing pretty well for most folks

I hope so.  For many of us 2.2 is no longer an option.  That is at least
without heavy patching to add support for hardware that isn't supported
by 2.2.

  Ralf

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:01:14 -0800
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption
Message-ID: <20010205140114.D3880@bacchus.dhis.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10102051356090.1124-100000@escobaria.sonytel.be> <E14PlGy-0003IW-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E14PlGy-0003IW-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:01:33PM +0000
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20010205220114.rdpSksdT93RGumCAgRNK2wSnXtp2I3GG_FfzowhoUF0@z>

On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:01:33PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Is the zero page mapped on non-m68k architectures?
> 
> It can certainly be hit by DMA and kernel memory ops
> 
> > > I dont believe any 2.4 is currently 'safe'
> > Ugh...
> 
> We'll get there, its doing pretty well for most folks

I hope so.  For many of us 2.2 is no longer an option.  That is at least
without heavy patching to add support for hardware that isn't supported
by 2.2.

  Ralf