From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:37:38 -0800 Received: from u-12-18.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.18.12]:55790 "EHLO dea.waldorf-gmbh.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:37:20 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1KKb3h04162; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:37:03 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:37:03 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "'linux-mips@oss.sgi.com'" , linux-mips Subject: Re: strace package Message-ID: <20010220213703.B2086@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20010116134453.B12858@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010219133346.A17354@cistron.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010219133346.A17354@cistron.nl>; from wichert@cistron.nl on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 01:33:46PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Hmm, I guess I should fix that :) > > I've started looking at strace again after not having had any time for > it in a while, and strace 4.3 should appear in a week or so. If there > are any problems with the MIPS support now is the time to tell me. > I'm especially interesting in strace reporting umoven() errors while > tracing a program. Conincidentally I today built strace-cvs for MIPS before receiving your message and found it to be working just fine. The only bug which my last several month old build from an older snapshot doesn't have is that syscall 4129 (from memory, number may be incorrect) gets decoded as a syscall with very many arguments (~ 20). Will have to look into it. Ralf