From: Jim Freeman <jfree@sovereign.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: sync plea
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:48:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010221234824.A2820@sovereign.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010221160418.A21995@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 04:04:18PM +0100
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 04:04:18PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 06:07:11AM -0700, Jim Freeman wrote:
...
> > The recent mips update into 2.4.2pre2 (thankyouthankyouthankyou...)
> > has helped in this task, but the diff between any 2.4.2pre[n>=2] or
> > 2.4.1-ac[n>=9] tree vs the MIPS cvs tree is still huge, and painful
> > to cull through to wind up with a sane mips patch (should be fairly
> > small since the update into 2.4.2pre2) against a 2.4.*{pre*|-ac*} tree.
> >
> > A sync of mips cvs to any 2.4.1{pre*|-ac*} kernel post 2.4.2pre2
> > would be of great use, but I don't know how much pain that entails
> > for the maintainers.
> >
> > In lieu of that, can anyone clue me in to newbie tricks (CVS or
> > otherwise) for syncing 2 trees less painfully than culling diffs?
>
> Imagine, that's what we do on a daily base. The most easy recipe to make
> diffs less painful is half a gig of RAM which brings time for diffing
> two kernel trees down to ~ 2s on an Origin or decent PC.
>
> Unfortunately Linus dropped piles of additional patches I sent to him.
> That's the standard way this works, so just wait ...
The problem was not the mips-related changes that didn't make it into
2.4.2pre, but the non-mips changes that the mips cvs tree wasn't sync'd
to.
The merge of 2.4.2 into mips cvs will solve this - then the diff will
be just mips-related changes.
Many thanks,
...jfree
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-22 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-21 13:07 sync plea Jim Freeman
2001-02-21 15:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-02-22 6:48 ` Jim Freeman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010221234824.A2820@sovereign.org \
--to=jfree@sovereign.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox