From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:32:21 -0800 Received: from u-89-10.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de ([62.180.10.89]:5114 "EHLO dea.waldorf-gmbh.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:32:07 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2DIRBb19054; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:27:11 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:27:11 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Karel van Houten Cc: bunk@fs.tum.de (Adrian Bunk), linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Compile error with current CVS kernel Message-ID: <20010313192711.F1208@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20010313152236.B1208@bacchus.dhis.org> <200103131818.TAA14585@sparta.research.kpn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103131818.TAA14585@sparta.research.kpn.com>; from K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:18:05PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:18:05PM +0100, Karel van Houten wrote: > > That's scary - these sections are explicitly mentioned in the linker > > script and yet ld places them near address zero. Oh pleassure, oh > > garbage. > > > > This can probably be fixed by changing the ldscript; can experiment what > > it takes to get your ld to place all sections with a LOAD attribute placed > > next to each other? My ld behaves fine. > > Can you point me to a binutils version and/or patches that should > behave OK for native compiles? It's not native vs. crosscompile; this problem with binutils hits in both cases and only older versions (which aren't suitable for use with glibc 2.2 ...) are not affected. Ralf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:27:11 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: Compile error with current CVS kernel Message-ID: <20010313192711.F1208@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20010313152236.B1208@bacchus.dhis.org> <200103131818.TAA14585@sparta.research.kpn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200103131818.TAA14585@sparta.research.kpn.com>; from K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:18:05PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Return-Path: To: Karel van Houten Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20010313182711.daejfl4zLrVmefmPjZpq7pEJKyv9MlKy6QcptAg4BoM@z> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:18:05PM +0100, Karel van Houten wrote: > > That's scary - these sections are explicitly mentioned in the linker > > script and yet ld places them near address zero. Oh pleassure, oh > > garbage. > > > > This can probably be fixed by changing the ldscript; can experiment what > > it takes to get your ld to place all sections with a LOAD attribute placed > > next to each other? My ld behaves fine. > > Can you point me to a binutils version and/or patches that should > behave OK for native compiles? It's not native vs. crosscompile; this problem with binutils hits in both cases and only older versions (which aren't suitable for use with glibc 2.2 ...) are not affected. Ralf