Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: Ian Thompson <iant@palmchip.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Debug format problem with -ggdb flag
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 14:53:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010505145344.B1252@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AF098B7.F111B230@palmchip.com>; from iant@palmchip.com on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:31:03PM -0700

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:31:03PM -0700, Ian Thompson wrote:

> I'm running into problems with the debug information that is generated
> by the kernel compilation process.  Basically, I'm seeing that 
> multiple function symbols have the same begin address in the .mdebug
> section.  For example -- the init_arch and r3081_wait functions in my
> build have differnet addresses as far as compilation is concerned, and
> code executes correctly.  When I look into the .mdebug section, I see 
> that the begin, end, stab, and external records are all correct for 
> the r3081_wait function, but that the begin record for the init_arch
> function is the same as that for the the r3081_wait function!  This in
> turn seems to be causing the stab and external records to be incorrect,
> causing symbolic problems in my debugger.  
> 
> I've traced the problem down, and it seems to be a side-effect of 
> partial linking.  When the linker links multiple .o files into another
> .o file (which is later used as input to another ld command), the 
> debug records inside the .mdebug section are getting corrupted.  Has
> anyone run into this problem before?  Any suggestions of other flags
> I can pass into the partial link that may help?  I'm using the mipsel
> rpm of binutils 2.9.5-3.  Or, are there any alternatives to 
> partial linking that don't involve a lot of makefile manipulation?
> 
> I've tried using the -gcoff option to remove the stab records, but that
> option does not allow the 2.4 kernel to compile under egcs 2.91.66.

So then is a binutils and not a compiler problem.  What binutils are you
using?  Binutils 2.8.1 which I'm still recommending (mostly to avoid
sending people into a maze of version dependencies) is getting dated and
the bug may well have been fixed in the meantime.

  Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-07 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-02 23:31 Debug format problem with -ggdb flag Ian Thompson
2001-05-05 17:53 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-05-08  7:36   ` binutils 2.8.1 problems Michael Shmulevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010505145344.B1252@bacchus.dhis.org \
    --to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=iant@palmchip.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox