From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f56KiM931613 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:44:22 -0700 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f56KiMh31610 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:44:22 -0700 Received: from nevyn.them.org (gateway-1237.mvista.com [12.44.186.158]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA05049 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:44:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (drow@nevyn.them.org) Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 157jqU-0007GI-00; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 13:24:02 -0700 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:24:02 -0700 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: "H . J . Lu" , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: New toolchain for Linux/mips Message-ID: <20010606132402.A27901@nevyn.them.org> References: <20010606110019.A23009@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: ; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:40:07PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > I've actually spent this week porting the gdb CVS head to MIPS; I've > > got it almost entirely working now. There's one problem with SIGTRAP > > Make sure your kernel is flushing the icache right. Hmm, thanks, I'll check. I don't think that's it, though. > > that I haven't quite figured out yet, and thread attach isn't quite > > working, and there's a kernel bug I've been repeatedly triggering that > > I think I just fixed. I anticipate it all being done in a couple of > > days - I'll post here and on the GDB list when I have it in slightly > > better shape. > > Great! Did you do you work from scratch -- hopefully not? Nope. It's based mostly on the same 4.17 patch from David Miller, and some bits from Ralf, all marked as assigned to the FSF (though I'm not sure if that ever actually happened); I'll straighten out copyright once I've got the whole thing done. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team