From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5702MO00430 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:22 -0700 Received: from ocean.lucon.org (c1473286-a.stcla1.sfba.home.com [24.176.137.160]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5702Mh00426 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:22 -0700 Received: by ocean.lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74D1E125BA; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:02:21 -0700 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Geoff Keating Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: mips gas is horribly broken Message-ID: <20010606170221.A30487@lucon.org> References: <20010606091846.A21652@lucon.org> <200106061932.MAA01399@geoffk.org> <20010606131551.A25655@lucon.org> <200106062159.OAA01491@geoffk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200106062159.OAA01491@geoffk.org>; from geoffk@geoffk.org on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 02:59:19PM -0700 Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 02:59:19PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote: > > First, redesign bfd_install_relocation so that it does the right thing > (there are other cases where the bfd backends have to work around > it). Then, change all the users to match. Then, test all the > supported platforms. Could you please tell me what you meant by "the right thing" and what exactly is wrong with the current design? On mips, it is addend which is handled incorrectly. Is this the only problem with bfd_install_relocation? H.J.