From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f6G4r6k25892 for linux-mips-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 21:53:06 -0700 Received: from dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (pD956F5FD.dip.t-dialin.net [217.86.245.253]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f6G4r3V25889 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 21:53:03 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f6G4pqo04660; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:51:52 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:51:52 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Jun Sun Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Jan-Benedict Glaw , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr Subject: Re: ll/sc emulation patch Message-ID: <20010716065151.A1333@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20010712224520.C23062@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010714125312.A6713@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010715213224.A19636@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010715213224.A19636@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:32:24PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:32:24PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote: > For compatibility reasons, I assume we still keep sysmips() around > for a while, right? And if that is yes, we better take either flo's or > my fix (derived from Maceij's new syscall) to get rid of the illegal > instruction bug, which really becomes an untolerable FAQ now. I've also debugged sysmips. Ralf