From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: Greg Satz <satz@ayrnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:11:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010721141119.A25053@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B77EA5E8.883E%satz@ayrnetworks.com>; from satz@ayrnetworks.com on Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:22:17AM -0600
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:22:17AM -0600, Greg Satz wrote:
> Hi Ralf, maybe I am missing something but after downloading and some perusal
> I don't see where the newer (2.4.5) kernel addresses this problem. At the
> risk of being redundant, the issue, as I see it, is the use of SCOMMON
> symbols in ELF section SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON (0xff03). These symbols are
> overlooked when insmod relocates symbols in the SHN_COMMON ELF section. They
> end up in the kernel with a value of 4. Upon being referenced, the module
> gets a page fault opps.
>
> The file obj/obj_reloc.c in the modutils package is where the SHN_COMMON
> symbol relocation work is performed. Using the gcc flag -fno-common forces
> all commons info bss thus preventing the problem. We do this as a
> work-around now.
>
> The question is whether the gcc -fno-common flag is the real fix or is
> obj/obj_reloc.c deficient. I have a patch that appears to work for
> obj/obj_reloc.c
>
> We create the problem situation by declaring variables in one file as extern
> and defining them in another.
You have common declarations that's declarations without static or extern
keywords and initalization. Perfectly legal.
> The compiler puts these variables in the SCOMMON segment instead of the
> COMMON segment.
Only if you don't compile / assemble / link with -G 0.
.scommon shouldn't ever be in a kernel object. It seems that ld started
to move .common objects to .scommon from a certain version on, so 2.4.5
now passes the right options. .scommon is used in global pointer
optimizations which doesn't work under Linux anyway as we use $gp ($28)
for a different purpose. So modutils should reject such a module right
away.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-21 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-20 22:15 SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Greg Satz
2001-07-20 22:15 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Greg Satz
2001-07-21 1:30 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Ralf Baechle
2001-07-21 9:22 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Greg Satz
2001-07-21 9:22 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Greg Satz
2001-07-21 12:11 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-07-21 17:41 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON H . J . Lu
2001-07-21 18:12 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Greg Satz
2001-07-21 18:12 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Greg Satz
2001-07-21 18:13 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON H . J . Lu
2001-07-21 18:56 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Ralf Baechle
2001-07-21 19:03 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON H . J . Lu
2001-07-21 23:20 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Ralf Baechle
2001-07-21 18:55 ` SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010721141119.A25053@bacchus.dhis.org \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=satz@ayrnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox