From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:45:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010808164502.A6966@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02a401c12063$cde1e830$3501010a@ltc.com>; from brad@ltc.com on Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:42:17PM -0400
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:42:17PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> I have spent quite a bit of time trying to get a gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3
> cross-toolchain working. I am not a Toolchain Builder, but I really wanted
> to try this combo and I don't see any way around building it myself.
>
> I've had some success. Everything seems to build fine. However, when I try
> to run a simple "hello world" dynamically linked with glibc, I get this:
>
> <myprogram>: error while loading shared libraries: failed to map
> segment from shared object: cannot load shared object file: Invalid
> argument
>
> I think it is trying to load libc.so.6, which is in my root in /lib/,
> symlinked to libc-2.2.3.so, and so is ld.so.1, symlinked to ld-2.2.3.so.
>
> I feel like I am pretty close, but I am starting to get discouraged and
> could really use some help. I really am clueless about what
> should/shouldn't work. I'm trying to do this based on bits and pieces of
> information that I've collected from countless sources. I have heard that
> gcc 3.0 isn't really "working", but I still want to try.
>
> Here is what I've used:
>
> * binutils-2.11.90.0.25.tar.gz (extracted from H. J. Lu's
> srpm on oss.sgi.com; I've tried others also)
> * gcc-3.0.tar.gz (released version - no patches)
> * glibc-linuxthreads-2.2.3.tar.gz (released version - no
> patches; glibc didn't want to configure without this)
> * glibc-2.2.3.tar.gz (released version)
You're missing the patch to change MAP_BASE_ADDR. You need that.
Something as simple as changing it to 0 will work for you, since you're
building everything yourself.
If you want debugging info, of course, it's much more complicated :)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-08 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-08 23:42 gcc 3.0 / glibc 2.2.3 cross-toolchain Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-08 23:42 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-08 23:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2001-08-08 23:58 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-08 23:58 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09 2:44 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09 2:44 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09 3:49 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09 3:49 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-08-09 13:03 ` Arnaud Rolly
2001-08-09 7:11 ` Ilya Volynets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010808164502.A6966@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=brad@ltc.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox