From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f8H1teU23138 for linux-mips-outgoing; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:55:40 -0700 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (u-10-20.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.20.10]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f8H1tZe23135 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:55:36 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f8H1tA424458; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 03:55:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 03:55:09 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "H . J . Lu" Cc: Ryan Murray , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Message-ID: <20010917035509.B24278@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20010916091654.C1812@lucon.org> <20010917000719.B25531@false.linpro.no> <20010916153857.H22750@cyberhqz.com> <20010916155003.B1446@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010916155003.B1446@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:50:03PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:50:03PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > I don't think mips is the only platform which has this problem. Do > Alpha, PowerPC and Sparc have similar problems like that? What are > the solutions for them? > > BTW, it sounds like the -fpic vs. -fPIC issue. It is. Yet I wouldn't like to assign a different meaning to -fpic and -fPIC as most makefiles make little difference between these two options, so that would imply quite some overhead. Ralf