From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>,
Ryan Murray <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>,
linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:53:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010917155325.A25017@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010917154001.D30386@redhat.com>; from rth@redhat.com on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:40:01PM -0700
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:40:01PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:55:09AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > It is. Yet I wouldn't like to assign a different meaning to -fpic and
> > -fPIC as most makefiles make little difference between these two options,
> > so that would imply quite some overhead.
>
> There is already such a difference. Sparc uses 13-bit GOT offsets
> with -fpic and 32-bit offsets with -fPIC. I'm considering changes
> to Alpha to use a 16/32 split for pic/PIC.
Can you mix object files compiled with -fPIC/-fpic on Sparc/Alpha?
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-17 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-16 12:17 linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Petter Reinholdtsen
2001-09-16 16:16 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-16 16:29 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-16 16:29 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-16 22:07 ` Petter Reinholdtsen
2001-09-16 22:38 ` Ryan Murray
2001-09-16 22:50 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-17 1:55 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-17 22:40 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 22:53 ` H . J . Lu [this message]
2001-09-17 22:56 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 23:06 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-17 23:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2001-09-17 22:47 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 22:56 ` Jakub Jelinek
2001-09-20 22:52 ` Geoff Keating
2001-09-26 10:08 ` Erik Corry
2001-09-16 22:50 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-16 22:50 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-17 1:50 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010917155325.A25017@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rmurray@cyberhqz.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox