From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f8P7X4714032 for linux-mips-outgoing; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:33:04 -0700 Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f8P7X1D14029 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:33:01 -0700 Received: from ginger.sonytel.be (ginger.sonytel.be [10.34.16.6]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA24328 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:32:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from tea@localhost) by ginger.sonytel.be (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id JAA16092 for linux-mips@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:32:58 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ginger.sonytel.be: tea set sender to tea@sonycom.com using -f Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:32:58 +0200 From: Tom Appermont To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: flush_cache_range Message-ID: <20010925093258.A16068@sonycom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Hi, Can someone explain me why start and end parameters are ignored in r4k_flush_cache_range_d32i32() and cache range flushing operations for other platforms? Tom