From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fA6L9D013070 for linux-mips-outgoing; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:09:13 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fA6L9C013067 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:09:12 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fA6L8dn30589; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:08:39 -0800 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:08:39 -0800 From: Ralf Baechle To: machael Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: vmalloc bugs in 2.4.5??? Message-ID: <20011106130839.B30219@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <013301c165cc$5d030fa0$4a1c690a@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <013301c165cc$5d030fa0$4a1c690a@huawei.com>; from dony.he@huawei.com on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 03:34:44PM +0800 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 03:34:44PM +0800, machael wrote: > I use linux-2.4.5 and I think VMALLOC may have some bugs which i don't > know how to fixup. Vmalloc is probably innocent I'd rather guess cache flushing is broken on your platform. Ralf