From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fAL8E7i07410 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:14:07 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fAL8E4o07407 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:14:04 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fAL7Dxt12954; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:13:59 +1100 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:13:59 +1100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: latest checksum.h Message-ID: <20011121181359.A12936@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20011121.151848.18315322.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011121.151848.18315322.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>; from nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 03:18:48PM +0900 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 03:18:48PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > Is it something wrong in latest checksum.h? > > a __asm__ statement in csum_fold() has two "r" operands but there are > no "%1" in the assembler template. Is this OK? > > # No patch because I'm not a __asm__ hacker :-) One of the famous quick fixes that just happens to work because it was my lucky day ... Fix in cvs. Ralf