From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fAR4Bjn05304 for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:11:45 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fAR4Bho05298 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:11:43 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fAR1HOt26575; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:17:24 +1100 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:17:24 +1100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: William Lee Irwin III , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: FPU interrupt handler Message-ID: <20011127121724.F2525@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20011127002405.E5465@dea.linux-mips.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:10:53PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:10:53PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Well, but what can I think when even fatal core errors remain > unnoticed?... The int-handler.S was one and the file wasn't changed for a > very long time, i.e. since I fixed another fatal error there... And both > looked like they were present from the day one... In that case if nobody complains those nobodies all had their fair chance :-) Ralf