From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fARLqNq32235 for linux-mips-outgoing; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:52:23 -0800 Received: from hell (buserror-extern.convergence.de [212.84.236.66]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id fARLqKo32232 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:52:20 -0800 Received: from js by hell with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 168pDA-000204-00; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:52:12 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:52:12 +0100 From: Johannes Stezenbach To: "H . J . Lu" Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.12 is released. Message-ID: <20011127215212.A7656@convergence.de> Mail-Followup-To: Johannes Stezenbach , "H . J . Lu" , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com References: <20011126212859.A17557@lucon.org> <20011127180022.A6897@convergence.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011127180022.A6897@convergence.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk I wrote: > b) I still get the -march vs. -mipsN warings: > > mipsel-linux-gcc -I /home/js/MIPS/kernel/build/linux-2.4.14-mips/include/asm/gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/js/MIPS/kernel/build/linux-2.4.14-mips/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -G 0 -mno-abicalls -fno-pic -mips2 -Wa,-m4100,--trap -pipe -fno-omit-frame-pointer -c -o sched.o sched.c > Assembler messages: > Warning: The -march option is incompatible to -mipsN and therefore ignored. /me being stupid. I forgot to apply the binutils-2.0.92.0.12/mips/binutils-mips-isa.patch. With the patch, binutils works correctly. Regards, Johannes