Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: Kip Walker <kwalker@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: .section problems in entry.S
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:18:35 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011209221835.A11737@dea.linux-mips.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C1104D4.F700768A@broadcom.com>; from kwalker@broadcom.com on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:05:08AM -0800

On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:05:08AM -0800, Kip Walker wrote:

> I just investigated assembler warnings coming from
> arch/mips/kernel/entry.S (checked out as of 12/07 00:00 UTC), and
> noticed the following.  After expanding macros, you get something like:
> 
> 	.text
> 
> 	.section ".text.init"   (from __INIT)
> 
> 	.data			(from PANIC)
> 	.previous		(from PANIC)
> 	--> section is now .text.init
> 
> 	.previous		(from __FINIT)
> 	--> section is now .data, not .text as intended.
> 
> Perhaps .pushsection and .popsection should be used in some or all
> macros like this?
> 
> Or am I smoking crack?

Certainly not.  The problem is known and so far I've just hacked around
it more or less elegant.  But it's a trap and so I think we've got good
reasons to force people to upgrade to a newer assembler than the current
minimal version.  The question is which - I don't like frequent tool
upgrades.

  Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-10  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-07 18:05 .section problems in entry.S Kip Walker
2001-12-10  0:18 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-12-10 16:03   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-12-13 20:45     ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-13 21:12       ` Thiemo Seufer
2001-12-13 21:27         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 22:13           ` Thiemo Seufer
2001-12-13 22:21             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 21:28       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 21:37         ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-13 21:41           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-14 14:47           ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011209221835.A11737@dea.linux-mips.net \
    --to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=kwalker@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox