From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g1BNASG17914
	for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:10:28 -0800
Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (a1as09-p62.stg.tli.de [195.252.189.62])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g1BNAO917907
	for <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:10:25 -0800
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g1BM7cX05176;
	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:07:38 +0100
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:07:38 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Johannes Stezenbach <js@convergence.de>, Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>,
   linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: gcc include strangeness
Message-ID: <20020211230738.E4623@dea.linux-mips.net>
References: <20020211142708.GA2577@convergence.de> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020211155920.18917F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020211155920.18917F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 04:10:34PM +0100
X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 04:10:34PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

>  Is gcc 3.x already stable enough to be used by people not directly
> involved in gcc development?  More specifically for MIPS/Linux and
> i386/Linux, for both the kernel and the userland?  I'm told it is not.

>>From the reports I'm gathering that we should ignore 3.0 and directly
go for 3.1.

  Ralf

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:07:38 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: gcc include strangeness
Message-ID: <20020211230738.E4623@dea.linux-mips.net>
References: <20020211142708.GA2577@convergence.de> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020211155920.18917F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020211155920.18917F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 04:10:34PM +0100
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Johannes Stezenbach <js@convergence.de>, Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20020211220738.plEXmbFjjTS5_LhFjH4RW6y-7qAAI2cC87OtKX03iOg@z>

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 04:10:34PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

>  Is gcc 3.x already stable enough to be used by people not directly
> involved in gcc development?  More specifically for MIPS/Linux and
> i386/Linux, for both the kernel and the userland?  I'm told it is not.

>From the reports I'm gathering that we should ignore 3.0 and directly
go for 3.1.

  Ralf