From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g1FFPd622962 for linux-mips-outgoing; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 07:25:39 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (a1as07-p91.stg.tli.de [195.252.188.91]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g1FFPZ922959 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 07:25:35 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g1FELWU00640; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:21:32 +0100 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:21:32 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Guido Guenther , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ip22 watchdog timer Message-ID: <20020215152132.A602@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20020215130613.A301@gandalf.physik.uni-konstanz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:17:17PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > This looks suspicious. Haven't you meant "dep_tristate"? Especially as > indydog.c doesn't seem to make any effort to validate it's running on the > system it thinks it is before poking random memory locations. It won't > probably even compile for a non-MIPS kernel. > > BTW, why do people insist on sending patches as attachments -- it makes > commenting them helly twisted, sigh... How true. MIME - broken solution for a broken design ;) More serious, MIME makes sense when using a MUA that garbles patches like Netscape or certain versions of Pine. Ralf (Prolly still be using Mutt + vi in 5 years ...)