From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g1FLXDd10126 for linux-mips-outgoing; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:33:13 -0800 Received: from neurosis.mit.edu (NEUROSIS.MIT.EDU [18.243.0.82]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g1FLX6910110; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:33:07 -0800 Received: (from jim@localhost) by neurosis.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id g1FKX5J11137; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:33:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:33:05 -0500 From: Jim Paris To: Ralf Baechle Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Guido Guenther , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ip22 watchdog timer Message-ID: <20020215153305.A11087@neurosis.mit.edu> Reply-To: jim@jtan.com References: <20020215130613.A301@gandalf.physik.uni-konstanz.de> <20020215152132.A602@dea.linux-mips.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020215152132.A602@dea.linux-mips.net>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:21:32PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk > > BTW, why do people insist on sending patches as attachments -- it makes > > commenting them helly twisted, sigh... > > How true. MIME - broken solution for a broken design ;) More serious, > MIME makes sense when using a MUA that garbles patches like Netscape or > certain versions of Pine. > > Ralf (Prolly still be using Mutt + vi in 5 years ...) Patches as attachments are actually really convenient with Mutt. You can view them seperately, extract and save them easily, etc. To comment on both the original message and the attachments: use view-attachments (v), use tag-entry (t) on all of the parts you want quoted in your reply, and then use tag-prefix & reply (;r) (or ;g or whatever). But I digress :) -jim