From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g1LDWYD02999
	for linux-mips-outgoing; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 05:32:34 -0800
Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de (dvmwest.gt.owl.de [62.52.24.140])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g1LDWS902944
	for <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 05:32:29 -0800
Received: by dvmwest.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 1B2D89EF2; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:32:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:32:22 +0100
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Toolchain question
Message-ID: <20020221133222.J21530@lug-owl.de>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.15-pre2 
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


--k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

I'm to build a new toolchain and looked around. There's still the
cross-all-20010423.tar package on oss.sgi.com. Is it still
recommened to use this, or am I better off using a current
CVS co of binutils and gcc?

MfG, JBG

--=20
Jan-Benedict Glaw   .   jbglaw@lug-owl.de   .   +49-172-7608481
	 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script --
	   http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/

--k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjx06NYACgkQHb1edYOZ4bvTJgCeIO1a/Ga3piLcOP0QoLKx90hR
I9gAnjX91fXMCgpiQPC8o7IFPK9zvKSm
=kOGN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1BdFSKqAqVdu8k/--