Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: William Jhun <wjhun@ayrnetworks.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/asm-mips/pci.h
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:25:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020620122525.B4835@dea.linux-mips.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206191326560.18638-100000@turbo-linux.engr.sgi.com>; from pj@engr.sgi.com on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:38:52PM -0700

On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:38:52PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:

> Yes - leave them out (speaking out of context here - hopefully still
> useful).
> 
> Remove the warnings instead.
> 
> I've gotten in the habit of having the following form to
> optional code logic:
> 
> In some header file foobar.h:
> 
>     #if CONFIG_FOOBAR
>     #define init_foobar(x) do {		\
> 	    int f = 2 * (x);		\
> 	    foobar_initialize(f);	\
> 	| while (0)
>     #else
>     #define init_foobar(x) do {} while (0)
>     #endif
> 
> I don't see any warnings from this, and it provides just
> the right sort of syntax wrapper on the macro init_foobar(),
> forcing it to be a single statement, regardless of context,
> while providing a nested block context for any local variables.

Note your variant doesn't deal with side effects of the argument expression
x (basically none of the equivalent constructions in the kernels do!) which
is why our code in question does something like this:

     #if CONFIG_FOOBAR
     #define init_foobar(x) do {               \
           int f = 2 * (x);            \
           foobar_initialize(f);       \
       | while (0)
     #else
     #define init_foobar(x) do { (x); } while (0)
     #endif

This can potencially expand into something like:

     do { 42; } while(0)

which will result in warnings.  The solution is:

     #define init_foobar(x) do { (void) (x); } while (0)

  Ralf

      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-06-20 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-18 17:03 [PATCH] dma_cache_wback, pci DMA cache coherency changes William Jhun
2002-06-19  9:39 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-06-19 18:22   ` [PATCH] include/asm-mips/pci.h William Jhun
2002-06-19 20:38     ` Paul Jackson
2002-06-19 20:38       ` Paul Jackson
2002-06-20 10:25       ` Ralf Baechle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020620122525.B4835@dea.linux-mips.net \
    --to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pj@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=wjhun@ayrnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox