From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: William Jhun <wjhun@ayrnetworks.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/asm-mips/pci.h
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:25:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020620122525.B4835@dea.linux-mips.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206191326560.18638-100000@turbo-linux.engr.sgi.com>; from pj@engr.sgi.com on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:38:52PM -0700
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:38:52PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Yes - leave them out (speaking out of context here - hopefully still
> useful).
>
> Remove the warnings instead.
>
> I've gotten in the habit of having the following form to
> optional code logic:
>
> In some header file foobar.h:
>
> #if CONFIG_FOOBAR
> #define init_foobar(x) do { \
> int f = 2 * (x); \
> foobar_initialize(f); \
> | while (0)
> #else
> #define init_foobar(x) do {} while (0)
> #endif
>
> I don't see any warnings from this, and it provides just
> the right sort of syntax wrapper on the macro init_foobar(),
> forcing it to be a single statement, regardless of context,
> while providing a nested block context for any local variables.
Note your variant doesn't deal with side effects of the argument expression
x (basically none of the equivalent constructions in the kernels do!) which
is why our code in question does something like this:
#if CONFIG_FOOBAR
#define init_foobar(x) do { \
int f = 2 * (x); \
foobar_initialize(f); \
| while (0)
#else
#define init_foobar(x) do { (x); } while (0)
#endif
This can potencially expand into something like:
do { 42; } while(0)
which will result in warnings. The solution is:
#define init_foobar(x) do { (void) (x); } while (0)
Ralf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-18 17:03 [PATCH] dma_cache_wback, pci DMA cache coherency changes William Jhun
2002-06-19 9:39 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-06-19 18:22 ` [PATCH] include/asm-mips/pci.h William Jhun
2002-06-19 20:38 ` Paul Jackson
2002-06-19 20:38 ` Paul Jackson
2002-06-20 10:25 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020620122525.B4835@dea.linux-mips.net \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=pj@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=wjhun@ayrnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox