From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5OFeqnC001179 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:40:52 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5OFeqEa001178 for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:40:52 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (c-180-196-18.ka.dial.de.ignite.net [62.180.196.18]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g5OFelnC001175 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:40:49 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5OFdtV01135; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:39:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:39:55 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Gleb O. Raiko" Cc: Carsten Langgaard , "linux-mips@oss.sgi.com" Subject: Re: Bug in __copy_user Message-ID: <20020624173954.A1109@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <3D1729F3.7241A74A@mips.com> <3D17376B.59333E27@niisi.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D17376B.59333E27@niisi.msk.ru>; from raiko@niisi.msk.ru on Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:14:51PM +0400 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Gleb, On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:14:51PM +0400, Gleb O. Raiko wrote: > This patch also solves the problem for mips in 2.4/2.5 kernel. My > question was about the patch for mips64 and mips in 2.2 kernel. > > Shall memcpy.S from 2.4/2.5 be backported to 2.2 and mips64? I think that would be the prefered solution as it'll be easier to maintain. I've not received any 2.2 patches in a very long, long time - anybody actually still using it? Ralf