From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6199jnC018508 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 02:09:45 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6199jVK018507 for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 02:09:45 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de (dvmwest.gt.owl.de [62.52.24.140]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g6199YnC017601; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 02:09:34 -0700 Received: by dvmwest.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4F458133AA; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:13:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:13:22 +0200 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Cc: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: [Oops] Indy R4600 Oops(es) w/ 2.4.19-rc1 Message-ID: <20020701091321.GO17216@lug-owl.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, Ralf Baechle References: <20020629220513.GC17216@lug-owl.de> <20020630174717.GI17216@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0Wg1ddIY7KV0vpwL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020630174717.GI17216@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.18 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk --0Wg1ddIY7KV0vpwL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-06-30 19:47:17 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote in message <20020630174717.GI17216@lug-owl.de>: > On Sun, 2002-06-30 00:05:13 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw > wrote in message <20020629220513.GC17216@lug-owl.de>: > [...] > > 10: bc600060 0xbc600060 > > Code; 88016ce0 > > 14: bc600080 0xbc600080 >=20 > Well, I've bulid the same kernel with CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED and the box > is running^Wsnailing fine with it. I'm experiencing a little peformance > drop (100 BogoMips -> 2.79 BogoMips), but it comes up in finite time:-) I've got some mail that support for my early R4600 (well, the bug fixes for it...) got removed some time ago. I've looked at the diff of r1.3 (2.4.16) and r1.3.2.3 (2.4.19-rc1) and it seems that mostly calls to __save_and_cli() and __restore_flags() got removed. Reading , it really seems that this is causing my problem. Ralf, would you accept a patch adding these lines again surrounded by #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_R4X00 ... #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_R4X00 */? The current state however isn't that fine: running uncached is no fun:-( MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script -- http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/ --0Wg1ddIY7KV0vpwL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9IB0wHb1edYOZ4bsRAs6oAJ47OhWL/0AShhQPW+rUSmBeTLsJVgCeJsHg HpoWThOHhN1lSyMS2Ksosos= =VToj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0Wg1ddIY7KV0vpwL--