From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g61HNjnC012599 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:23:45 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g61HNjCs012598 for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:23:45 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de (dvmwest.gt.owl.de [62.52.24.140]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g61HNZnC012584 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:23:36 -0700 Received: by dvmwest.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DC6D8133AB; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 19:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 19:27:25 +0200 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [Oops] Indy R4600 Oops(es) w/ 2.4.19-rc1 Message-ID: <20020701172725.GW17216@lug-owl.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com References: <20020701151359.GR17216@lug-owl.de> <200207011725.TAA16476@sparta.research.kpn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ddJi1IsAv4W/kcDl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207011725.TAA16476@sparta.research.kpn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.18 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk --ddJi1IsAv4W/kcDl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2002-07-01 19:24:59 +0200, Karel van Houten wrote in message <200207011725.TAA16476@sparta.research.kpn.com>: > > On Mon, 2002-07-01 16:28:13 +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki > > wrote in message > > : > > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > Feel free to use the change privately. Otherwise please code a real= fix, > > > i.e. a set of buggy-R4600-specific functions, as CONFIG_CPU_R4X00 mea= ns > > > other processors as well, e.g. R4000 or R4400 which are fine here.=20 > > >=20 > > > Actually blocking interrupts for over 0.01s as it used to be done is > >=20 > > Ah. That would explain the huge time drifts when the box is under > > load... >=20 > Indeed, I'm now running 2.4.18, and for the first time my DS5000/260 and > DS5000/200 can keep exact time, even under heavy load. > Btw, I use a R4400SC CPU. Oh. Lucke you, unlucky /me... MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script -- http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/ --ddJi1IsAv4W/kcDl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9IJD8Hb1edYOZ4bsRAm8DAJ4zZ1wFo0FQl4JXzAV1M1shfQEphACePsdB D8kx5PORf14pTBE85b1g6H8= =PWwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ddJi1IsAv4W/kcDl--