Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:04:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020702140451.A18214@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020702220651.B9566@dea.linux-mips.net>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:06:51PM +0200

On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:06:51PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:40:45AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> 
> > The ll/sc emulation is implemented in 2.4.0 and above. This patch makes
> > glibc always use ll/sc.
> 
> Which means the overhead of two syscalls instead of one sysmips() call
> for something that is assumed to be dirt cheap.  R3000, R5900 etc.
> users won't this patch you, which'll have significant impact on their
> glibc performance.
> 

Not all ll/sc usages are implemented with sysmips. Does mips care about
those? In case of libstdc++, should mips use ll/sc emulation?


H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-04  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-02 18:40 PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips H. J. Lu
2002-07-02 20:06 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-07-02 21:04   ` H. J. Lu [this message]
2002-07-04  8:00     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-07-04  8:47   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-07-04  8:47     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-07-04 13:57     ` Ralf Baechle
2002-07-04 14:14       ` Hiroyuki Machida
2002-07-08 17:21       ` Jun Sun
2002-07-08 17:34         ` Ralf Baechle
2002-07-16  0:59 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-07-16 15:22   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-07-16 15:42     ` H. J. Lu
2002-07-17  8:31       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-07-17 15:01         ` H. J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020702140451.A18214@lucon.org \
    --to=hjl@lucon.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox