From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g63Mx0Rw017342 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:59:00 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g63Mx0pO017341 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:59:00 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (c-180-196-235.ka.dial.de.ignite.net [62.180.196.235]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g63MwrRw017287 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:58:54 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g63N2WB22402; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:02:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:02:32 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: "H. J. Lu" , Eric Christopher , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, GNU C Library , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: RFC: Use -Wa,-xgot for Linux/mips (Re: MIPS GOT overflow in gcc 3.2.) Message-ID: <20020704010232.A21624@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20020701184640.A2043@lucon.org> <1025575632.30577.64.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <1025579401.1785.0.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <20020703093518.A2401@lucon.org> <20020703164039.GA12583@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020703164039.GA12583@nevyn.them.org>; from dan@debian.org on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:40:39PM -0400 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:40:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Did you see my message about mixing GOT models? I'd need Ralf or Eric to > confirm this, but I'm pretty sure there's a lot of luck involved in > your workaround. I've not seen your posting but yes, due to other static objects involved into linking there definately is luck involved. Ralf