From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g67EY7Rw030693 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:34:07 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g67EY7lm030692 for linux-mips-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:34:07 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g67EY3Rw030683 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:34:03 -0700 Received: from ocean.lucon.org ([12.234.143.38]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020707143814.CIZX8262.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@ocean.lucon.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:38:14 +0000 Received: by ocean.lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E92A3125D5; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:38:13 -0700 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Vivien Chappelier Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: more on my slab problem Message-ID: <20020707073813.B23481@lucon.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from vivien.chappelier@enst-bretagne.fr on Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:44:56AM +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:44:56AM +0200, Vivien Chappelier wrote: > > This was with binutils 2.11.92.0.10. > > Sorry, this was actually binutils 2.9.5 > That binutils is broken. The binutils in my RedHat/mips 7.1/7.3 should be ok. If not, I'd like to see a testcase. H.J.